Parameterized complexity of dpll search procedures acm. A dpll algorithm for solving dqbf andreas fr ohlich, gergely kov asznai, and armin biere institute for formal models and veri cation johannes kepler university, linz, austria. Motivation ipropositional logic allows for therepresentationof knowledge and for derivingconclusionsbased on this knowledge. We have proposed an improved variant of the dpll algorithm and designed an efficient data structure for it. Parameterized resolution was recently introduced by dantchev, martin, and szeider 24 in the context of parameterized proof complexity, an extension of the proof complexity approach of cook and reckhow 23 to parameterized complexity. While it is outperformed by local search algorithms on satis.
It is easy to prove that the deciding problem of graph isomorphism is a np problem. The complexity of inversion of explicit goldreichs. We define complexity as a numerical function thnl time versus the input size n. We illustrate this technique by showing lower bounds to the parameterized pigeonhole principle and to the ordering principle. The dpll davisputnamlogemannloveland algorithm is one of the bestknown algorithms for solving the problem of satisfiability of propositional formulas. While the basic procedure itself is 50 years old, practical dpll based sat solvers. A transition system is a binary relation over states. Parameterized resolution was recently introduced by dantchev, martin, and szeider 18 in the context of parameterized proof complexity, an extension of the. Dafny is a highlevel imperative language with support for object oriented features. We want to define time taken by an algorithm without depending on the implementation details. Massimo lauria, parameterized complexity of dpll search procedures, proceedings of the 14th international conference on theory and application of satisfiability testing, june 1922, 2011, ann arbor, mi. In this thesis, we discuss the details of our implementation of the dpll algorithm as well as a mathematical application of our solver. A branch of the tree is no longer expanded if s i fgor 2s i where is the empty clause.
My understanding was that o is only the upper bound. Parameterized complexity of dpll search procedures 20. Complexity results on dpll and resolution request pdf. Dpll time complexity analysis computer science stack. When preparing for technical interviews in the past, i found myself spending hours crawling the internet putting together the best, average, and worst case complexities for search and sorting algorithms so that i wouldnt be stumped when. From the perspective of complexity analysis, the boolean satisfiability problem. For more references or inspiration as to why dpll works the way it does, you might try reading some of the complexity theoretic material surrounding sat in any good textbook on complexity theory. We have come up with an idea to make the unitpropagation faster than. To facilitate our subsequent discussion of variants of this algorithm, we will omit unit resolution from the pseudocode.
Algorithm capability and applications in artificial intelligence. We study the performance of dpll algorithms on parameterized problems. We denote an interpretation by the set of literals containing x or x depending on whether x is assigned to true or false. At any time the state of the algorithm is a pair f. Essentially the algorithm looks for a satisfying valuation of a given cnfformula by depth rst search. The backtracking algorithm can be described as follows. Satis able formulas are much easier for solvers nikolenko, 2002, achilioptas,beame, mollo,y 20032004 exponential lower bound for speci c dpll algoritms alekhnovich, hirsch, itsykson, 2005 exponential lower bound. Complexity normalforms dpll complexity dpllimplementation bibliography espenh.
Foundations of artificial intelligence propositional logic. Every output depends on d inputs and is computed from them by the fixed predicate of arity d. If s i fgthen s is satis able and we can stop the procedure. Instructions to run the dpll algorithm import the project into eclipse and run solver. What makes a particular instance hard or easy is at most. Dll dpll searchbased basis for current most successful solvers stalmarcks algorithm more of a breadth first search, proprietary algorithm stochastic search local search, hill climbing, etc.
The dpll algorithm davis, putnam, logemann, loveland, 1962. Request pdf parameterized complexity of dpll search procedures we study the performance of dpll algorithms on parameterized problems. We say that such a state is successful if asets some literal in each clause of f to true, that is. For this purpose we develop a proverdelayer game that models the running time of dpll procedures and we establish an informationtheoretic method to obtain lower bounds to the running time of parameterized dpll procedures. In this section, we first show that the results about how to combine formulae allow improving the current results on the complexity of choosing the branching literal in dpll nphardness and conp. Similarly, space complexity of an algorithm quantifies the amount of space or memory taken by an algorithm to run as a function of the length of the input. Fast and flexible difference constraint propagation for dpllt. There is no previous study of which i am aware on determining the capability of an algorithm in terms of the complexity of problems that it can be used to solve. Given a formula f in cnf, dpllf returns a boolean value true or false and. Algorithmic complexity is usually expressed in 1 of 2 ways. Widely used solving procedures, as the davisputnamlovelandlogeman dpll. Heuristic averagecase analysis of the backtrack resolution of. This project should made me familiar with rust and the test driven approach.
Pdf hard satisfiable formulas for dplltype algorithms. We study the performance of dpll algorithms on parameterized prob lems. Phase transitions and complexity of weighted satis. Parameterized complexity of dpll search procedures white rose. Dpll time complexity analysis computer science stack exchange. Wehrle universit at basel foundations of arti cial intelligence april 25, 2016 4 1. The most well known algorithm for solving sat is called dpll.
Using dpll off the shelf actually leads to a pretty crappy solution, and there are a few key tricks that you can play to do much better. Jul 26, 2007 satsolvers have turned into essential tools in many areas of applied logic like, for example, hardware verification or satisfiability checking modulo theories. Satsolvers have turned into essential tools in many areas of applied logic like, for example, hardware verification or satisfiability checking modulo theories. This method is called with a constraint c every time the dpll engine extends the. We address lower bounds on the time complexity of algorithms solving the propositional satisfiability problem. A transition system is a binary relation over states, induced by a set of conditional. Widely used solving procedures, as the davisputnamlovelandlogemann dpll algorithm, perform a systematic search for a solution, through a sequence of trials and errors represented by a search tree. Time and space complexity depends on lots of things like hardware, operating system, processors, etc. This webpage covers the space and time bigo complexities of common algorithms used in computer science. The study of the parameterized proof complexity of the satis ability prob. Citeseerx document details isaac councill, lee giles, pradeep teregowda.
An abstract framework for dpll the dpll procedure can be described declaratively by simple sequentstyle calculi. While this is a useful tool, it isnt really relevant to algorithm complexity. Foundations of artificial intelligence propositional. Algorithmic complexity university of california, berkeley. The dpll algorithm enhances over the backtracking algorithm by the eager use of the following rules at each step. Dependency quanti ed boolean formulas dqbf comprise the set of propositional formulas which can be formulated by adding henkin quanti ers to boolean logic. A read is counted each time someone views a publication summary such as the title, abstract, and list of authors, clicks on a figure, or views or downloads the fulltext. Formula caching in dpll institute for advanced study. Such calculi however cannot model metalogical features such as backtracking, learning and restarts. A propositional interpretation is a mapping from the set of variables to the set true,false. Since this time, there has been extensive work on attempting to improve upon this algorithm by providing heuristics and optimizations for improving the performance of this backtracking search algorithm. In this paper we analyze the complexity of the problem of choosing an optimal literal.
Algorithm capability and applications in artificial. The algorithm generaterandomformulan,m will then create a random formula with n literals which are grouped into clauses with the maximum size of m randomly. But we do not know either whether it can be decided in. Complexity results on dpll and resolution 3 is a formula and l is a literal. Parameterized complexity is a branch of complexity theory where problems are analyzed in a. The dpll algorithm combinatorial problem solving cps albert oliveras enric rodrguezcarbonell may 10, 2019. Complexity of ksat a sat problem with input in cnf with at. Parameterized complexity of dpll search procedures. We denote an interpretation by the set of literals containing x or x. The dpll algorithm, developed by davis and putnam 6 and by davis et al. If p np then no superpolynomial lower bounds for dpll algorithms since heuristic b may choose corect value. This is a major improvement over the omn complexity of 17. The need to be able to measure the complexity of a problem, algorithm or structure, and to obtain bounds and quantitive relations for complexity arises in more and more sciences.
A gentle introduction to algorithm complexity analysis. Algorithm complexity is something designed to compare two algorithms at the idea level ignoring lowlevel details such as the implementation programming language, the hardware the algorithm runs on, or the instruction set of the given cpu. In complexity theory it was the first problem proved to be npcomplete, and can. The first is the way used in lecture logarithmic, linear, etc.
However, although recent implementations are able to solve problems with hundreds of thousands of variables and millions of clauses, much smaller instances remain unsolved. Visualizing sat instances and runs of the dpll algorithm. The computational complexity of solving random 3satisfiability 3sat problems is investigated. This algorithm is just a simple backtracking with some pruning strategy. Analysis of the computational complexity of solving. Institute for theoretical computer science practical sat solving lecture 4 carsten sinz, toma. These are the offtheshelf proof systems that correspond to taking your favorite dpll algorithm and directly adding on memoization of different kinds, without otherwise modifying the original algorithm. In computer science, the time complexity is the computational complexity that describes the amount of time it takes to run an algorithm. Modelling nqueens problem as conjunctive normal form and solving it with dpll algorithm. Apply inference rules to leaves, expanding the tree.
In particular, we investigate how difficult it is to decide whether. This clearly written, mathematically rigorous text includes a novel algorithmic exposition of the simplex method and also discusses the soviet ellipsoid algorithm for linear programming. The dpll algorithm returns sat if the formula is satisfiable, unsat oth erwise. Dpll algorithm is a boolean satisfiablity solver that takes a set of variables and connectives in cnf and returns either a satisfying assignment that would make the cnf sentence true or determines that no satisfying assignment is possible. Time complexity is commonly estimated by counting the number of elementary operations performed by the algorithm, supposing that each elementary operation takes a fixed amount of time to perform. An analysis of the averagecase complexity of solving random 3satisfiability sat. Its efficiency is affected by the way literals to branch on are chosen. I constraint satisfaction problems of all kinds i circuit design and veri cation imany problems contain logic as. Imany practical applications can be directly encoded, e.
To deal with a boolean structure of a formula we use the well known dpll procedure since it is the. The goldreichs function has n binary inputs and n binary outputs. This has the advantage of keeping them very close to possibly implementable. It can be seen as ps version of the boolean satisfiability problem. A sharp threshold in proof complexity dimitris achlioptas microsoft research one microsoft way redmond, wa 98052. Solving satisfiability of ground term algebras using dpll and. In this section, we first show that the results about how to combine formulae allow improving the current results on the complexity of choosing the branching literal in dpll. I will note that the technique used in dpll is a common technique used in proofs in complexity theory, where you guess a partial assignment to things, and then try to fill in the rest. Wehrle universit at basel foundations of arti cial intelligence april 25, 2016 3 1 31. Satisfiability and model construction dpll procedure, phase. Parameterized resolution was recently introduced by dantchev, martin, and szeider 23 in the context of parameterized proof complexity, an extension of the proof complexity approach of cook and reckhow 22 to parameterized complexity. On the complexity of choosing the branching literal in dpll. One of our most interesting results is the introduction of a natural and implementableformofdpll withcaching, fcw reason. For example, if m is the simple dpll algorithm 12, then pm is exactly the treelike resolution i.
The beauty of that algorithm is that it is both simple and ef. Roughly speaking, a complete satisfiability algorithm is automatizable if its running time is polynomial in the size of the optimal proofs. It can be solved in polynomial time by a single step of the unit propagation algorithm, which produces the single minimal model of the set of horn clauses w. Namely, we consider two dpll type algorithms, enhanced with the unit clause and pure literal heuristics. A more clever complexity proof can prove better upper bound complexity results than your naive approach.
Tinelli, cesar 2004, abstract dpll and abstract dpll modulo theories pdf, proceedings int. This is a more mathematical way of expressing running time, and looks more like a function. However, we dont consider any of these factors while analyzing the algorithm. The dpll algorithm, developed by davis and putnam dp60 and by davis, logemann, and loveland dll62, is the most popular complete algorithm for the problem of satis. Every goldreichs function is defined by its dependency graph g and predicate p. The dpll algorithm james worrell 1 the dpll algorithm the davisputnamlogemannloveland dpll algorithm is a procedure that combines search and deduction to decide satis ability of cnf formulas. Dpll, by identifying the language membership of its traces, one gains a fundamental understanding of the intrinsic complexity and computational power. The dpll algorithm is basically a backtracking algorithm in the search space of the partial models, enhanced with three rules aiming at reducing the size of the search tree or the total running time. The size of the search tree accounts for the computational complexity, i. In computer science, the davisputnamlogemannloveland dpll algorithm is a complete, backtrackingbased search algorithm for deciding the satisfiability of propositional logic formulae in conjunctive normal form, i. Analogously to the case of fixed parameter tractable fpt algorithms.
Statistical physics analysis of the computational complexity. We model dpll and its enhancements as transition systems instead. In logic and computer science, the davisputnamlogemannloveland dpll algorithm is a. Phase transitions and complexity of weighted satisfiability.
1051 1018 931 1447 1112 164 773 192 403 559 912 276 194 393 40 683 830 1001 586 1462 1128 42 356 1165 1368 1668 365 1192 154 897 1423 1265 683 20 1263